Comparison - Initial Provisioning vs. Power-by-the-hour
Chapter 3 of 5
Both Initial Provisioning and Power-by-the-hour solutions for aircraft procurement have been around for decades, so there is no question that there is viability in both.
However, there are stark differences between the two. Arguably, Power-by-the-hour is more for airlines that want to take a more hands-off approach to the management of their spares stock and maintenance. PBH requires a tremendous amount of trust in your suppliers and partners to deliver the parts and service effectively and efficiently.
In contrast, Initial Provisioning is more for airlines that prefer keeping everything in-house—where control of the maintenance service and stock availability is not subject to outside factors.
While there are benefits and challenges to both options, let's look at some deciding factors in more detail.
3.1 What is the overall cost?
On paper, Initial Provisioning of spare parts seems to have a clear disadvantage when it comes to cost analysis, as the initial investment can be much higher—to account for full spares stock procurement, storage and potential material management training for staff.
However, this initial cost assessment can be a bit of a misnomer. IP is not necessarily more expensive than a PBH coverage. PBH fees usually depend on the contract time, part-number scope, fleet size and utilisation, potential on-site stock, lead time for availability of covered spare parts from central PBH warehouse, amongst others. Typically, PBH fees also need to be paid if there are no replacements during a year or a defined period, meaning the customer is not credited if no usage is made of the PBH contract.
In short, the cost difference between Power-by-the-hour and Initial Provisioning can be marginal when looked at over an extended period. And while IP does require more up-front investment, it also provides the security of available stock and reliable MRO that is arguable an equally valuable currency.
3.2 Spares Availability
At the end of the day, the race to minimise AOG times during an initial service period all comes down to having the right (and recommended) spare part at the right time. Both Power-by-the-hour and Initial Provision solutions approach this challenge in different ways.
Initial Provision, in contrast, typically centralises in one location, sometimes paring that with MRO facilities. Thus, mitigating the risk that external factors can have on spare parts availability.
Power-by-the-hour solutions may circumvent some of the more cumbersome requirements of maintenance and material management by out-sourcing those to various operators bases. It can be subject to many uncontrollable factors that can hamper material availability. As we mentioned in Chapter 1, market shifts, geopolitical situations like Brexit, and shifts in maintenance certification requirements can contribute to unpredictability when it comes to having a specific part available, exactly when it is needed.